Skip to content

Product

Evidence you can forward, not minutes you retype

One click produces a findings report over the documents you select: every contradiction with its evidence, every superseded statement with its chain, and a summary of what verification rejected. Signed, so a third party can verify it was not altered.

The auditor gets evidence, not summaries

Each contradiction appears with both claims, both verbatim source sentences, the document with revision and location for each side, the detection date, and its resolution status.

Superseded facts appear with their chains, and the suppressed fact summary makes what was rejected part of the record.

The signature covers a defined scope

A report is always produced over an explicitly selected set of sources, so what was audited is part of the record, not an assumption.

Findings that reference a document outside the selected scope appear in a clearly labelled boundary section rather than being silently included or dropped.

The report states its own accuracy

The artifact you forward declares the measured trust scores of the exact model configuration that produced it. No other document tool tells your auditor how accurate it is.

The same numbers are public on the trust page for every release, per language and per configuration.

The published trust scores
92.9%
Contradiction recall
91.9%
Verification agreement
94.4%
Deduplication accuracy
102
hand-labeled golden cases behind the numbers

Live from the published per-release trust scores. The report carries the scores of its own model configuration; these are the current aggregates.

Built for the file it ends up in

PDF and JSON

PDF for the auditor and the design review record, JSON for your quality system, both signed through the same path as deletion receipts.

Before an audit

Four years of documentation, several hundred files, two languages, some scans. Next morning: the findings. Six weeks later the signed report goes into the design review record.

On the day of a change

A change notice arrives by mail and conflicts with one interface document. That finding surfaces the same day, not during an audit two years later.

Not a regulatory assessment

Cogeto produces evidence about your documents. Regulatory judgment stays with your organization, and the docs say so plainly.

Your first report comes out of the pilot.

Bring a real document set. The pilot ends with the signed findings report on your material, and you keep it either way.